Q&A with SeattlePI.com’s Michelle Nicolosi a must-read

Michelle Nicolosi, executive producer of the new SeattlePI, offers some great insight into the direction of the former Post-Intelligencer’s new online endeavor.

Nicolosi talks with Content Bridges about news sites that she goes to for inspiration (The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald),  partner content for PI, it’s impressive resource of Reader Blogs, and much more. Here’s Nicolosi on:

Aggregation, fair use and the newspaper blues

Today, a fellow journalist e-mailed me this link to a New York Times article on the fair use of online content. He’s of the opinion that sites that aggregate and excerpt material are essentially stealing. Well …

While the Times article doesn’t break any new ground on this topic — at least not for those who’ve been following it on a regular basis — it does provide a decent general overview for newcomers.

However, one of its assertions doesn’t quite tell the whole story:

Social media, online news hubs and Nielsen ratings

As news sites turn to more localized coverage, will readers choose to get their news from general news sources such as the New York Times, or will they turn to specialty websites? That’s just one of the issues raised in Joshua Benton’s video interview with author James Hamilton today at Nieman Journalism Lab.

Hamilton, who wrote All the News That’s Fit to Sell, also discusses how TV news stations use Nielsen ratings data to influence the stories it covers, and how social media informs the types of issues journalists write about.

Key to better TV websites: change the station’s culture

Rick Garner’s top 10 list of tips for making TV websites relevant offers some excellent advice for news sites of all stripes to consider, not the least of which is his overall point that in order to effect the changes he recommends, TV stations must change their culture:

Most TV stations spend more time and resources on their onair product and save the scraps for online. This isn’t surprising since onair revenue is still king and what keeps the books in black. This has allowed local TV sales staffs to remain very green at selling their online inventory and being able to convince advertisers to buy their goods.

Why is this? Because the root of the problem hasn’t changed. Like a cancer, every TV station has a core that’s keeping them from success: the culture. Change a station’s culture and you can do wonders. Change a culture and a website can become relevant to the station personnel and their customers. Change a culture and a people can enjoy coming to work and making a difference.

#9 on Garner’s list follows a basic tenet of Web design and usability:

Keep content fresh, but don’t forget your readers

At MediaShift, Roland Legrand offers seven ways that news sites can engage in low-cost content creation, including link journalism, publishing works in progress on blogs (a practice that I’ve been a fan of for the past four years) and user-generated content (if the quality’s there to attract readers).

But when he advocates throwing raw source files online, I’m not so sure:

Newspapers have ways of making you pay, aggregators

Enjoy the hard work of professional journalists while you can, online aggregators. Take one last bath in the million of dollars you’ve reaped from advertisements around content you didn’t create. Because if the folks behind Newspaper Project have their way, it’s likely your free ride will be over.

Publisher Randy Siegel talks to Columbia Journalism Review about the recently launched Newspaper Project, a coalition of newspaper executives endeavoring to share ideas about their industry vital.

Siegel, described by interviewer Megan Barber as the leader of the project, talks about the purpose of the organization, touts the value of professional journalism, and then throws down the gauntlet before the “information wants to be free” champions:

Newsosaur’s prescriptions for newspapers transitioning to an online model

In his final installment of “Making the Print-Digital Transition,” Newsosaur Alan Mutter offers a list of things the newspaper industry needs to do now if it is to regain financial well-being.

In his previous posts, Mutter looked at why newspapers need their print editions, especially if they want to build an online following of readers and advertisers.

Now, the Newsosaur provides a get-well-soon recipe:

EveryBlock’s creator says “follow your passion”

I’ve put up a couple of posts about EveryBlock, here and here. Today, I found David Cohn’s brief interview with EveryBlock creator Adrian Holovaty at the Poynter Institute. Go to Aggregation is Creation at NewsInnovation to watch their talk.

Toward the end of the discussion, Holovaty offers advice for computational journalists, which I think could apply to journalists of all stripes: “Pick something you’re passionate about, and make a website about it.”

GateHouse v. New York Times settled

GateHouse Media and the New York Times Co. settled their dispute over the Times Co.’s use of the headlines and ledes from GateHouse’s Wicked Local sites. Here’s the upshot, as quoted from the settlement by Joshua Benton of Nieman Journalism Lab:

GateHouse will implement one or more commercially reasonable technological solutions … intended to prevent [NYT Co.]‘ copying of any original content from GateHouse’s websites and RSS feeds … which [NYT Co.] shall not directly or indirectly circumvent. …

Defendants shall remove all GateHouse RSS feeds from the aggregation tool currently being used to copy and display GateHouse’s  original headlines and ledes on boston.com’s yourtown websites, and shall refrain from accessing such feeds so long as GateHouse maintains any Solution(s) described in paragraph (1) to this Letter Agreement.

The Times Co. must also take down any GateHouse headlines and ledes archived on the Boston Globe’s Your Town websites by March 1. (The New York Times Co. own the Boston Globe.)

As one might have expected, the reaction to the settlement has focused on the perceived threats to “fair use.” Mathew Ingram worries that the deal sets a bad precedent for linking and quoting material on the Web: